http://4.bp.blogspot.com/--jzpWtijFWA/TnekETnNeGI/AAAAAAAAAJw/EHlPLYvn6p0/s728/2B002A.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/--jzpWtijFWA/TnekETnNeGI/AAAAAAAAAJw/EHlPLYvn6p0/s728/2B002A.jpg

Sunday, May 7, 2017

Luke 1–24 | Luke Review


Luke 19:10for the Son of Man has come to seek and to save that which was lost.”
What we will study this morning in the review of the third Gospel, known as The Book of the Son of Man…the 01. The Author (Luke 1:1-3a); 02. The Audience (Luke 1:3b); 03. The Purpose of the Book (Luke 1:4); and 04. The Theme of the Book (Luke 19:10).
01. The Author (Luke 1:1-3a)
Luke is only mentioned 3 times in the New Testament. Each of these occurrences is in the Prison Epistles written by Paul (Colossians 4:14; Philemon 24; 2 Timothy 4:11), and from these passages, as well as his firsthand accounts in the Book of Acts (Acts 16:11-17; Acts 21:1-6) we can safely assume that he was a faithful companion of Paul. In Colossians 4:14, we are told by Paul that Luke was a doctor by trade. The Gospel of Luke is filled with more precise medical terms compared to other New Testament books, and Dr. Luke was very detailed in recording dates and doing exhaustive research (Luke 1:1-3a), thus making him essentially the 1st church historian. Dr. Luke is the only evangelist (writer of a Gospel book) that wrote a sequel to his Gospel, the book of the Acts of the Apostles. Most identify Dr. Luke as a Gentile, and many base this belief off of his name not being mentioned by Paul along with other Jews in Colossians 4:10-11, but then Paul mentions him later (Colossians 4:14), and from this many have gathered that Dr. Luke was a Gentile. If this is true, than Dr. Luke is probably the only Gentile writer chosen by God to write part of the Bible. In size, the combination of the Gospel of Luke and the book of the Acts of the Apostles make up about 28% of the New Testament and are larger than all of Paul’s epistles combined.
Luke 1:1 Dr. Luke records for his reader that he himself gathered written accounts of Jesus. We do not know for sure who these writers were. There is a chance that the Gospels written by Matthew (for the Jews-45ad) and Mark (for Gentile Roman Christians 57-59ad) could have been among these accounts, as they were written before Dr. Luke wrote this Gospel (circa 60 ad). Obviously, whatever these written accounts were (aside from Matthew and Mark), they were not inspired (G2315 θεόπνευστος theopneustos God-breathed- 2 Timothy 3:16) as they were not included in the canon, the Bible as we know it today.
Luke 1:2 Dr. Luke records his 2nd source of information: eyewitness accounts. Notice that Dr. Luke does not claim himself as being an eyewitness. So he obviously had to interview eyewitnesses to glean from them what they heard and saw Jesus say and do, including His miracles. The disciples were there at the beginning with Jesus when He performed His 1st miracle of turning the water into wine at the wedding feast (John 2:1-11). Many believe that one of the people that Dr. Luke interviewed was Mary, the mother of Jesus, which would explain why he had more information on the childhood of Jesus (Luke 2:1-52) than the other three Gospel writers.
Luke 1:3 “having had perfect understanding of all things from the very first,” can actually be translated as having, by diligent and careful investigation, followed up everything to the source, to obtain an accurate account of the matter.”[1] When Luke says here that he wrote “to write to you an orderly account,” (Luke 1:3) he was saying that he took all the fragments and eyewitness accounts and was guided by the Holy Spirit in writing them down in an orderly account so they can be easily read. So with both the written and eyewitness accounts, Dr. Luke studied methodically like you would expect a doctor to do, and guided by the Holy Spirit he compiled the 3rd Gospel.
02. The Audience (Luke 1:3b)
Luke 1:3b “most excellent Theophilus,”
Even though the Gospel of Luke, as well as the Book of Acts (Acts 1:1) was both addressed to Theophilus, we really don’t know much about him. The name Theophilus means “lover or loved of God”. There are some who think that Theophilus might have been a ruler of some sort, because Luke uses the title “most excellent” (Luke 1:3) or “most noble” in reference to Theophilus. The title “most excellent” was a title like “Your Excellency” and shows that he held office, perhaps a Knight. So of Felix (Acts 23:26; Acts 24:3) and Festus (Acts 26:25).[2] Even though this Gospel was written primarily for Theophilus, reading through this book seems to reveal that Dr. Luke also had the Gentiles in mind as well.
Some examples of this would include:
-Dr. Luke rarely focuses on Jesus fulfilling prophecies, because that wasn’t as important to the Gentiles as it was for the Jews.
-Dr. Luke never used the Hebrew term “Rabbi” (G4461) for teacher, whereas Matthew used it in his Gospel.
-Dr. Luke referred to Roman Emperors in designating the dates of the birth of Jesus (Luke 2:1) as well as the beginning of John the Baptist’s teaching ministry (Luke 3:1).
-Dr. Luke explains certain feasts and customs that a Jew would have known and been familiar with, but not for someone who is a Gentile (Luke 2:41-42; Luke 22:1; Luke 23:17).
-Dr. Luke traced the genealogy of Jesus all the way back to Adam (Luke 3:23-38) rather than just to Abraham, which is what Matthew (who wrote his Gospel to the Jews) did (Matthew 1:1-17). This seems to suggest that Jesus represents all of mankind and not just the Jews.
-Dr. Luke repeatedly explained locations in Israel (Luke 4:31; Luke 8:26; Luke 21:37; Luke 23:51; Luke 24:13). This clearly would be pointless if he were writing to Jews who were familiar with the Promised Land.
-Luke used the Greek Septuagint (which is the Old Testament written in Greek in Egypt in about 284bc by 70 scholars, hence the name Septuagint which means 70) when quoting from the Old Testament (Luke 2:23-24; Luke 3:4-6; Luke 4:4; Luke 4:8; Luke 4:10-12; Luke 4:18-19; Luke 10:27; Luke 18:20; Luke 19:46; Luke 20:17; Luke 20:28; Luke 20:37; Luke 20:42-43; Luke 22:37). Though Dr. Luke’s quotation found in Luke 7:27 does not seem to be from the Greek Septuagint or the Hebrew Masoretic text, but from some other text.
Here are some other important aspects of this Gospel:
-More than any other Gospel, Dr. Luke mentions the prayers of Jesus (6 times-Luke 3:21-22; Luke 5:16; Luke 6:12; Luke 9:28; Luke 11:1; Luke 22:40-46), mentions two parables relating to the importance of prayer (Luke 11:9-14; Luke 18:1-8) and Jesus’ two teachings on prayer (Luke 6:28; Luke 11:1-4).
-The Greeks were always looking for the perfect combination of God and mankind. They wanted one who had the best characteristics of both men and women, but with no faults. Throughout this Gospel we see Jesus as both strong and compassionate. Jesus’ sympathy and compassion are often brought up, and this could be why women and children hold a prominent place in this book.
03. The Purpose of the Book (Luke 1:4)
Dr. Luke had 2 main reasons to write this Gospel:
01. To confirm the faith of Theophilus, showing him that his faith in Jesus was not based on fables but of well-founded historical facts (Luke 1:2-4).
02. To present Jesus as the Son of Man (emphasizing the humanity and humility of Jesus) who was rejected by Israel. Because of this rejection by Israel, Jesus was also preached to the Gentiles so that they could know God personally and receive salvation.
26 times (out of 46 times in the New Testament) the title “Son of Man” is mentioned in the Gospel of Luke about Jesus (Luke 5:24; Luke 6:5; Luke 6:22; Luke 7:34; Luke 9:22; Luke 9:26; Luke 9:44; Luke 9:56; Luke 9:58; Luke 11:30; Luke 12:8; Luke 12:10; Luke 12:40; Luke 17:22; Luke 17:24; Luke 17:26; Luke 17:30; Luke 18:8; Luke 18:31; Luke 19:10; Luke 21:27; Luke 21:36; Luke 22:22; Luke 22:48; Luke 22:69; Luke 24:7).
“Son of Man” is used throughout the Book of Ezekiel, but every time it is in reference to the prophet Ezekiel himself. But “Son of Man” is used once in the Book of Daniel, in reference to the coming Messiah (Daniel 7:13) and once of Daniel himself (Daniel 8:17). Dr. Luke wrote this Gospel to the Gentiles to emphasize the humanity and humility of Jesus, and the title “Son of Man” speaks of that. Jesus had a true human body (cf. Luke 2:7; Luke 2:51–52; Luke 24:39-43; Philippians 2:5-8; Hebrews 2:14). He was the perfect man.
04. The Theme of the Book (Luke 19:10)
Looking at this verse, we see the theme of this Gospel, as well as the divisions of this Gospel. This verse breaks Dr. Luke’s Gospel into three clear parts:
01. Luke 19:10 “for the Son of Man has come” Dr. Luke records in Luke 1-3 how the Son of Man was born “who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God, but made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a (SLAVE) bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men.” (Philippians 2:5–8) First the Son of Man came, which Dr. Luke covers at the beginning of this Gospel (Luke 2:6–16).
02. Luke 19:10 “to seek” Next we see that Dr. Luke records for us in Luke 4-19:27 the ministry of the Son of Man who came to seek out men who were lost, ministering to the dregs of society, healing those in need of healing, forgiving sins, as well as piercing into the emotions, thoughts, and feelings of mankind, exposing the depravity and hypocrisy of man and their manmade religion of Rabbinic Judaism. In Luke 9-19:27, Dr. Luke records the journey of Jesus to Jerusalem, and gives us the accounts of his interactions with various people along the way to the cross (cf. Luke 9:51).
03. Luke 19:10 “and to save that which was lost.” In Luke 19:27-24:53, we see the final days of Jesus here on earth, from His triumphal entry, the cleansing of the Temple, His final week before the cross, then His death, resurrection and ascension (Acts 1:4–11).


[1] Notes on the New Testament by Albert Barnes
[2] Robertson, A. T. (1933). Word Pictures in the New Testament (Lk 1:3). Nashville, TN: Broadman Press.

No comments:

Post a Comment