http://4.bp.blogspot.com/--jzpWtijFWA/TnekETnNeGI/AAAAAAAAAJw/EHlPLYvn6p0/s728/2B002A.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/--jzpWtijFWA/TnekETnNeGI/AAAAAAAAAJw/EHlPLYvn6p0/s728/2B002A.jpg

Monday, February 18, 2013

Text, Context, Pretext, Proof Text

“A text without a context is a pretext for a proof text.”
-D.A. Carson

This quote, attributed to Carson’s father by Carson himself, is essentially saying that when you take a passage from the Bible out of its context it leads the reader to come to false conclusions.

The word text comes from the old Latin word “textus” which means “style of a work” or literally “things woven”. The “text” is any Bible verse or passage. The “context” is the verses or passages that surround the text. Each text has a context and Scripture cannot be broken and the whole hangs together perfectly woven as one unit.

A “pretext” is essentially an excuse. It literally means, “giving a reason for something to conceal the true motive.” A “proof text” is the text from Scriptural that proves, or is used to prove a claim, a certain doctrine or teaching.

Carson is saying that often what many “pastors” and lay people do is they take a single verse or phrase out of “context” to “prove” a particular view.

The Bible is one whole unit, and even though it is broken up into books, chapters and verses, it is to be taken as a whole, as one unit, and not sixty-six separate books or one thousand one hundred eighty nine chapters, but as one perfect unit.

Paul, writing under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit said to his young pastor Timothy, declares that…
2 Timothy 3:16 “16 All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness;” (NASB)

“All Scripture” means both Old and New Testaments.

The Greek word that is translated “inspired” is “theopneustos” which literally means “God-breathed”.

“A text without a context is a pretext for a proof text.”
-D.A. Carson

This is true about reading and interpreting the Bible, but also in regards to other subjects. You ever overhear a conversation between two people, and because you came in late to the conversation, you heard a remark by one of the people. You immediately form an opinion about that person, and you can be completely wrong because you didn’t hear the whole conversation and only a small portion.

Have you ever seen part of a movie or show halfway through, and as you try to figure out the plot, and who the characters are, you form an opinion based off of your limited knowledge. It’s not until you see it in its sum that you realize what you thought about a character was wrong and you now understand why they acted the way that they did.

One of the often misquoted texts taken out of context for a proof text is found in the Gospel of Matthew, chapter eighteen verse twenty:

“For where two or three have gathered together in My name, I am there in their midst.” (NASB)

Many pastors who I respect, as well as many martexts (pastors who take a text out of context) have consistently quoted this verse completely out of context, thus forming a pretext for a proof text.

Hearing this as a young follower of Christ, I was told that this meant that whenever I was in church, or Sunday School, or with any other Christians Christ was there with us. But I remember thinking to myself, “Does this mean that when I am alone, reading the Bible or praying, does it mean that Christ is not with me?”

Of course it doesn’t mean that!

Jesus is always with us; for He said that He will never leave nor forsake us (John 16.07; Hebrews 13.05).

Even when we are literally alone…He is with us! For nothing can separate us from His love (Romans 08.35; 39) and He dwells in us (Romans 08.11). Paul said, “Christ (is) in you, the hope of glory.” (Colossians 01.27)
So let’s look at this text in context so that we have an accurate understanding of what this verse means.

In Matthew 18, Jesus was giving His disciples various instructions about humility (v. 1-6); and about those who cause offenses (v. 7-14).

Let’s start reading at verse 15 of Matthew 18:
         “15 “If your brother sins, go and show him his fault in private; if he listens to you, you have won your brother. 16 “But if he does not listen to you, take one or two more with you, so that BY THE MOUTH OF TWO OR THREE WITNESSES EVERY FACT MAY BE CONFIRMED. 17 “If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector. 18 “Truly I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed in heaven. 19 “Again I say to you, that if two of you agree on earth about anything that they may ask, it shall be done for them by My Father who is in heaven. 20 “For where two or three have gathered together in My name, I am there in their midst.”” (NASB)

Did you see where Jesus said if you are not with other Christians you will be all alone? Of course you didn’t see that!

Jesus just spoke about offense, now He was telling His disciples how to handle the situation when someone who claims to be a follower of Christ sins.

“15 “If your brother sins, go and show him his fault in private; if he listens to you, you have won your brother.” (NASB)

When a brother sins against another, the two of them are to meet together and discuss what happened and resolve it. They are not to post it on a social networking site, telling the world how bad so and so is. They are to go to them, meet and try to resolve the issue. If it can be resolved, than praise the LORD you have won your brother!

“16 “But if he does not listen to you, take one or two more with you, so that BY THE MOUTH OF TWO OR THREE WITNESSES EVERY FACT MAY BE CONFIRMED.” (NASB)

But, if your brother refuses to listen to you, you are than to take two or three witnesses with you so that there is a clear testimony about what happened. This was to keep the Old Testament teaching from Deuteronomy 19.15:
          “A single witness shall not rise up against a man on account of any iniquity or any sin which he has committed; on the evidence of two or three witnesses a matter shall be confirmed.”

“17 “If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector.” (NASB)

But if the sinning brother refuses to repent and acknowledge his sin, than the situation is to be brought before the local church and told before all the church the situation. If the sinning brother refuses to repent even after all this, he is to be treated like a pagan (Gentile) or a tax collector, who both were heavily looked down upon by the Jews.

“18 “Truly I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed in heaven. 19 “Again I say to you, that if two of you agree on earth about anything that they may ask, it shall be done for them by My Father who is in heaven. 20 “For where two or three have gathered together in My name, I am there in their midst.”” (NASB)

In conclusion, Jesus says that whatever decision is made about the sinning brother, after applying the Word of God correctly in context, spending time in prayer and seeking God’s leading, He, Jesus, will be in the midst of that decision.

We now have seen how crucial it is to properly take a text in context. Taking a text out of context leads to confusion, error, false doctrine, and may cause some to fall away from the faith.

Sunday, February 17, 2013

Is The Next Pope the Last?


Dear Brothers,
I have convoked you to this Consistory, not only for the three canonizations, but also to communicate to you a decision of great importance for the life of the Church. After having repeatedly examined my conscience before God, I have come to the certainty that my strengths, due to an advanced age, are no longer suited to an adequate exercise of the Petrine ministry. I am well aware that this ministry, due to its essential spiritual nature, must be carried out not only with words and deeds, but no less with prayer and suffering. However, in today’s world, subject to so many rapid changes and shaken by questions of deep relevance for the life of faith, in order to govern the barque of Saint Peter and proclaim the Gospel, both strength of mind and body are necessary, strength which in the last few months, has deteriorated in me to the extent that I have had to recognize my incapacity to adequately fulfill the ministry entrusted to me. For this reason, and well aware of the seriousness of this act, with full freedom I declare that I renounce the ministry of Bishop of Rome, Successor of Saint Peter, entrusted to me by the Cardinals on 19 April 2005, in such a way, that as from 28 February 2013, at 20:00 hours, the See of Rome, the See of Saint Peter, will be vacant and a Conclave to elect the new Supreme Pontiff will have to be convoked by those whose competence it is.
Dear Brothers, I thank you most sincerely for all the love and work with which you have supported me in my ministry and I ask pardon for all my defects. And now, let us entrust the Holy Church to the care of Our Supreme Pastor, Our Lord Jesus Christ, and implore his holy Mother Mary, so that she may assist the Cardinal Fathers with her maternal solicitude, in electing a new Supreme Pontiff. With regard to myself, I wish to also devotedly serve the Holy Church of God in the future through a life dedicated to prayer.
From the Vatican, 10 February 2013

BENEDICTUS PP XVI[i]

With these words, the world received the shocking news. For the first time since the middle ages the pope would resign with Pope Benedict XVI resigning at the end of February 2013.

The last time this happened was in 1415ad when there were three popes: Pope Gregory XII (considered by the Roman Catholic Church as the true pope of this time), Benedict XII, and John XXIII were asked to step down to clear the papacy and essentially start over. While Pope Gregory XII and John XXIII agreed to step down, Benedict XII refused and was excommunicated. In 1417ad Martin V was elected as the next pope.

Many people were left wondering “Why?” Some grieved accepting his resignation and offering gratitude for his faithful service. While others searched for something more… Is there another reason he stepped down? Many of these people began to visit the ancient Roman Catholic “Prophecy of the Popes”. Which prophesied the names of one hundred and twelve popes that would occupy the Chair of St. Peter. To date one hundred and eleven names of these men have been correctly prophesied. Only one pope remains on the list.
St. Malachy, the author of the “Prophecy of the Popes” has now been thrust into the lime light with the Pope Benedict XVI’s announcement.

Pope Clement III canonized St. Malachy in 1199ad. He became the first Irish saint canonized by a pope. St. Bernard described him as born of noblity in Armagh, Ireland in 1094ad.

St. Malachy was appointed Archbishop of Armagh in 1132ad and he was known to be very zealous for the faith. St. Bernard credited him with the restoration of discipline in the church at Armagh.

In 1139ad, St. Malachy journeyed to Rome to give an account of the affairs of his diocese to Pope Innocent II. It was during this trip that he had a mystical vision. The vision included a list of the final one hundred and twelve popes that would rule the Roman Catholic Church until the end of time.

St. Malachy wrote the vision down. The vision included each pope’s motto, papal name and an explanation of their name. St. Malachy reportedly gave this manuscript to Pope Innocent II. It was to be a consolation of sorts due to the hardships he encountered during his reign as Pope.

This document given to Pope Innocent II remained hidden or unknown in the Vatican archives for four hundred years until it was discovered in 1590ad, but was not published until five years later by Arnold de Wyon. Since this time there have been many accusations of forgery made both within the Roman Catholic Church and from outside of it.

One of the strongest arguments that the document is a forgery is that St. Bernard never mentioned St. Malachy’s Prophecy of the Popes in his biography, “Life of St. Malachy”.

Those who believe that St. Malachy’s Prophecy of the Popes is authentic say that the proof is undeniable. There are one hundred and eleven popes who have been correctly identified in the prophecy.

St. Malachy’s Prophecy of the Popes begins with Pope Celestine II, who became Pope in 1143ad, and ends with Peter the Roman who is the last pope to reign on earth according to the prophecy.

In order to interpret these prophesies people who support the authenticity of it many times have to really dig deep to connect the dots. Often it is something very obscure even miniscule that they rely on the make the prophecies fit. Such as their name, where they were born, 

It was been rumored that many popes have been chosen because they “fit” the next name on St. Malachy’s Prophecy of the Popes.

In recent history Cardinal Karol Wojtyła was elected pope in 1978. He chose the name Pope John Paul II. According to St. Malachy’s Prophecy of the Popes, the one hundred and tenth pope’s motto would be “From the Labor of the Sun” (De labore solis), meaning that he was the pope “of the eclipsed sun”. Pope John Paul II was born on a day that had a solar eclipse (May 18, 1920), elected to the Papacy on a day with a solar eclipse (October 16, 1978) and was buried on the day of a solar eclipse (April 08, 2005).

Everyone thought that the pope after Pope John Paul II would come from the Order of Saint Benedict. Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was not a part of this order. However, since he chose the name Benedict XVI many believe he was trying fulfill St. Malachy’s prophesy, the “Glory of the Olive” (Gloria olivæ). Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger chose the name of Pope Benedict XVI even though he was not a Benedictine priest. Benedict was the founder of the Order of Saint Benedict, and one of the branches of the Benedictine order is the Olivetans, hence the “Glory of the Olive”.

St. Malachy stated that the one hundred and twelfth pope would be the final pope. Petrus Romanus, or Peter the Roman is the name of the final pope. It is interesting to note that no pope has yet ever chosen the papal name of “Peter” out of respect for Peter, one of the twelve disciples of Jesus Christ.  The Roman Catholic Church recognizes St. Peter as the first pope.

Attached to the name of the one hundred and twelfth pope, Peter the Roman, who according to St. Malachy is this prophesy, “Peter the Roman, who will nourish the sheep in many tribulations; when they are finished, the city of seven hills will be destroyed, and the dreadful judge will judge his people. The end.”

There have been some rumblings from Rome that the reason that the College of the Cardinals who chose each successive pope chose Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger as the next pope was because of his advance in age, they know he will not be pope for long. So therefore if he acts against their will, they can pressure him to cite health reasons as a cause to be the first pope in almost six hundred years to resign.

What many believe is that this Peter the Roman will be the next pope of the Roman Catholic Church & usher the Church into God’s Kingdom here on earth. The Roman Catholic Church has primarily believed in being able to bring God’s Kingdom here on earth through their own efforts, which contradicts what many Protestant Christians believe that Jesus will come and establish His Kingdom here on earth.

Only God ultimately seems to know what will happen next, and if this is truly the beginning of the end of the world.

We are told that the Bible is the inspired (meaning “God-breathed”) Word of God.
2 Timothy 3:16 “16 All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness;” (NASB)

The Bible clearly says that prophecy only comes from God…
2 Peter 1:20, 21 “20 But know this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of one’s own interpretation, 21 for no prophecy was ever made by an act of human will, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God.” (NASB)

So whether someone in the Vatican is trying to manipulate St. Malachy’s Prophecy of the Popes, or its just coincidence, only God knows the future and


[i] http://en.radiovaticana.va/articolo.asp?c=663815