http://4.bp.blogspot.com/--jzpWtijFWA/TnekETnNeGI/AAAAAAAAAJw/EHlPLYvn6p0/s728/2B002A.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/--jzpWtijFWA/TnekETnNeGI/AAAAAAAAAJw/EHlPLYvn6p0/s728/2B002A.jpg

Sunday, June 29, 2014

Luke 06.17-19 | Sermon on the Level (part 01)


Luke 06.17-19

01. The Location (Luke 06.17a)
Luke 06.17a “17 Jesus came down with them and stood on a level place;”

After spending all night in prayer (Luke 06.12), Jesus then called out of the multitude of disciples that followed Him the Twelve Apostles (Luke 06.13-16, cf. Choosing The Twelve) who would spend the next few years in close proximity to our LORD.

There are many people who seem to think that the rest of this chapter (Luke 06.20-49) is a condensed version of the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew 05.01-07.29. Yet there are many who believe just the opposite, that Dr. Luke records for us another account of Jesus teaching that is similar to the Sermon on Mount (Matthew 05.01-07.29).  They will point out here that Dr. Luke tells us that Jesus came down the mountain with His newly appointed Apostles (Luke 06.13-16) and delivered this account on level ground. But it can be argued that this level place was just a plateau in the mountains, and that Jesus went up to pray (Luke 06.12), called His Apostles (Luke 06.13-16) and then came down to the plateau. Matthew records for us that Jesus “went up on the mountain; and after He sat down, His disciples came to Him.” (Matthew 05.01) and He began teaching the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 05.01-07.29), while Dr. Luke records for us that Jesus “stood on a level place” (Luke 06.17). This can be answered easily by pointing out that Jesus stood while healing the people (Luke 06.17-18), and as was the custom of the rabbis of the day, He would’ve sat down (Matthew 05.01; Matthew 13.02; Mark 04.01; Luke 04.20; Luke 05.03; John 08.02) when it came time to teach (Luke 06.20-49).

I tend to lean towards the thought this is just a condensed version of the Sermon on the Mount.

02. The Audience (Luke 06.17-19)
Dr. Luke records for us three groups of people who were present for the Sermon on the Mount. First there were the newly appointed Apostles, referred to as “them” in Luke 06.17. These Apostles were the chosen twelve to be the messengers of Jesus. The second group was the “large crowd of His disciples” (Luke 06.17). These were the ones not chosen to be Apostles, and were at different levels of knowledge and commitment to their rabbi, Jesus. Some of these would be proven to be true followers, but most as time went on would desert Him (John 06.66). The third and final group who were there were “great throng of people from all Judea and Jerusalem and the coastal region of Tyre and Sidon” (Luke 06.17). This group was made up of those who were curious. The Greek word that Dr. Luke used here for “people” in Luke 06.17 is (G2992) laov. Dr. Luke primarily uses this Greek word (G2992) laov to describe those people who were inquisitive yet noncommittal towards Jesus (cf. Luke 07.01; Luke 07.29; Luke 08.47; Luke 09.13; Luke 18.43; Luke 19.48; Luke 20.01; Luke 21.38; Luke 23.35). This third group or “great throng of people” were “from all Judea and Jerusalem” (Luke 06.17), the religious center of Israel. They were also from “the coastal region of Tyre and Sidon” (Luke 06.17), which were two of the most important cities in Phoenicia (Jeremiah 47.04; Joel 03.04; Matthew 11.21-22; Acts 12.20), just Northwest of the Sea of Galilee on the shores of the Mediterranean Sea in modern day Lebanon.

Luke 06.18-19  Jesus was popular because of His powerful preaching (even if people didn’t really listen), and the power to heal. Jesus here is healing people of their sicknesses, as well as casting demons out of people (Luke 04.31-37, cf. The Authority of Jesus). Wherever He went “the news about Him was spreading even farther and large crowds were gathering to hear Him and to be healed of their sicknesses.” (Luke 05.15; Luke 04.14) Everywhere that He went, Jesus preached the good news that the Messiah was here to “PREACH THE GOSPEL TO THE POOR…TO PROCLAIM RELEASE TO THE CAPTIVES, AND RECOVERY OF SIGHT TO THE BLIND, TO SET FREE THOSE WHO ARE OPPRESSED, TO PROCLAIM THE FAVORABLE YEAR OF THE LORD.” (Luke 04.18-19; Isaiah 61.01-02).

Today, pastors and teachers alike are to merely teach the truth that Jesus taught, not to add our opinions, or to make the Gospel fit for the post-modern generation.

03. The Righteousness of the Saints
The theme of the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew 05.01-07.29 is righteousness. The Greek word that is used for righteousness is (G1343) dikaiosunh from the root word (G1342) dikaiov and it means the character or quality of being right or just. In English it used to be spelled “rightwiseness” which makes the definition of righteousness all the more clearer.

Righteousness, when used by Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 05.01-07.29; see also John 16.08; John 16.10) is used of whatever is right or just in itself, whatever conforms to the revealed will of God.
(cf. Vine, W.E.; Merrill F. Unger (1996-08-28). Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words: With Topical Index (Kindle Locations 52252-52260). Thomas Nelson. Kindle Edition.

Paul, writing to the church in Rome said, “For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. For in it the righteousness (G1343 dikaiosunh) of God is revealed from faith to faith; as it is written, “BUT THE RIGHTEOUS (G1342 dikaiov) man SHALL LIVE BY FAITH.” For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness,” (Romans 01.16-18).

Paul in Romans 01.17 was quoting from Habakkuk 02.04, which says, “Behold, as for the proud one, His soul is not right within him; But the righteous will live by his faith.”

In the Hebrew “righteous” is (H6662) qydu tsaddiyq and in the Greek Septuagint (which is the Old Testament written in Greek in Egypt in about 284bc by seventy scholars, hence the name “Septuagint” which means “seventy” and usually abbreviated as LXX), the Greek word for “righteous” in Habakkuk 02.04 is (G1342) dikaiov.

Paul writes in his epistles to the Galatians and Romans “that a man is not justified by the works of the Law but through faith in Christ Jesus, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, so that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the Law; since by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified.” (Galatians 02.16) “for through the Law comes the knowledge of sin.” (Romans 03.20) because “Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel beforehand to Abraham, saying, “ALL THE NATIONS WILL BE BLESSED IN YOU.” So then those who are of faith are blessed with Abraham, the believer. For as many as are of the works of the Law are under a curse; for it is written, “CURSED IS EVERYONE WHO DOES NOT ABIDE BY ALL THINGS WRITTEN IN THE BOOK OF THE LAW, TO PERFORM THEM.”” (Galatians 03.08-10) for “the Law has become our tutor to lead us to Christ, so that we may be justified by faith. But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor. For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus. For all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s descendants, heirs according to promise.” (Galatians 03.24-29) “For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law.” (Romans 03.28) “for if righteousness comes through the Law, then Christ died needlessly.” (Galatians 02.21)

Paul mentioned that we are the spiritual descendants of Abraham (Galatians 03.29), and James quoting Genesis 15.06 says that “Scripture was fulfilled which says, “AND ABRAHAM BELIEVED GOD, AND IT WAS RECKONED TO HIM AS RIGHTEOUSNESS,” and he was called the friend of God.” (James 02.23)

So according to the New Testament writers, the faith of Abraham (as well as that of Isaac, Jacob, Job, Enoch and Noah) is the same as our faith today! All of the early patriarchs of our faith did not have the Law of Moses, yet they were justified by faith because they placed their faith in God and not in the polytheistic religious systems that were so prevalent at their time.

Moses records for us that Enoch “walked with God: and he was not; for God took him” (Genesis 05.24), a sign of the rapture of believers to come (1Thessalonians 04.13-18). Moses tells us that Noah “found grace in the eyes of YHWH” and that he “was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God.” (Genesis 06.08-09) while Peter says that Noah was “a preacher of righteousness” (2Peter 02.05). Here we have two Godly men, who were not circumcised according to the Law (Leviticus 12.03), yet they are regarded as righteous faithful men who are mentioned in Hebrews 11.05 and Hebrews 11.07. Notice that the writer of Hebrews has Enoch and Noah bookend a great verse about faith in Hebrews 11.06.

Abraham came after Enoch and Noah, and it was he who was the one that God made the covenant of circumcision (Genesis 17.10-17; Acts 07.08). The sign of the covenant that God made with Abraham was circumcision, and yet God instituted it after Abraham was called by God to step out in faith and he left his homeland (Hebrews 11.08-11) and his false pantheistic idolatrous religion (Joshua 24.02).

Paul tells us that circumcision was supposed to be an outward sign of the condition of your heart (Deuteronomy 10.16; Deuteronomy 30.06; Jeremiah 04.04; Colossians 02.11) in Romans 02.25-29. Paul goes on to tells us that Abraham was made righteous before he was circumcised (Romans 04.09-15)! Paul tells the Galatians that “in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything, but faith working through love.” (Galatians 05.06) and that “we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law. Or is God the God of Jews only? Is He not the God of Gentiles also? Yes, of Gentiles also, since indeed God who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through faith is one.” (Romans 03.28-30). Moses tells us that when Abram “believed in YHWH; and He reckoned it to him as righteousness.” (Genesis 15.06)

Moses introduces us to Melchizedek, who received tithes from the spoils of war by Abram in Genesis 14.01-24. Moses records for us that Melchizedek was “a priest of God Most High” who met Abram bringing out “bread and wine”, the elements of communion (Genesis 14.08; Hebrews 05.10; Hebrews 07.01). Again this was all before the Law of Moses was given, so Melchizedek would have been uncircumcised, not from the tribe of Levi and a descendant of Aaron (Leviticus 21.16-23) and was not anointed according to the Law prescribe by Moses (Exodus 29.01-37). Melchizedek blessed Abram in Genesis 14.19-20, which is significant because the greater always blesses the lesser, and Abraham is regarded as the father of our faith (Romans 04.16-25; Galatians 03.01-29)! The writer of Hebrews tells us that Melchizedek was a pre-incarnate Christ, saying “Jesus has entered as a forerunner for us, having become a high priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek.” (Hebrews 06.20)

So we see in these Old Testament saints that they were justified by faith in God before the Law was given, even though they never saw the fulfillment of the promises of God (Hebrews 11.13-16).

Paul tells us that the Law was given “because of transgressions” (Galatians 03.19)

In order for the Law to be fulfilled, in God’s perfect timing, He sent His Son to be a man to redeem mankind from sin so that we might be sons of God (Galatians 04.04-07). Peter tells us that righteousness comes from God and His Son in that God sent His Son to die for sinners, “To those who have received a faith of the same kind as ours, by the righteousness of our God and Savior, Jesus Christ:” (2Peter 01.01)

Next time when we start studying the Sermon on the Mount/Level, we will see that the word “Blessed” appears. The Greek word for “Blessed” is (G3107) makariov and it involves happiness that does not depend on circumstances but on the condition of the heart no matter what is going on around you. The way that the text is written is important, because it is not telling us that we should try to put into use the beatitudes so that we become blessed, but instead it is describing what are the characteristics of a “blessed” person.

That’s why we looked at the Old Testament saints, who were justified and made righteous before the Law because of their faith in Christ, “because by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified in His sight; for through the Law comes the knowledge of sin.” (Romans 03.20) “For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law.” (Romans 03.28) “nevertheless knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the Law but through faith in Christ Jesus, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, so that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the Law; since by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified.” (Galatians 02.16)

Sunday, June 22, 2014

Luke 06.12-16 | Choosing The Twelve


Luke 06.12-16 In Choosing the Twelve we will study about the Twelve Apostles that Jesus chose after spending all night in prayer.

Throughout time we have seen that God uses normal, regular, everyday, unwise, foolish person to do the extraordinary, something that Paul illustrates in 1Corinthians 01.20-29. God chose Abraham who was an idolater (Joshua 24.02), a liar when he called his wife his sister (Genesis 20.01-18), and lacking in faith sinned in Genesis 16.01-15. Yet God chose him and called him His friend (Isaiah 41.08) and had him become the father of the nation of Israel (Genesis 15.01-21; Isaiah 51.02; Luke 01.73) and our spiritual father (Romans 04.16-25; Galatians 03.01-29). God chose Moses, the son of Hebrew slaves (Exodus 02.01-10) who grew up in the Egyptian palace and murdered an Egyptian (Exodus 02.11-12), spent forty years in the wilderness as a shepherd (Exodus 02.14-22; Exodus 02.14-22; Acts 07.29-30) and misrepresented God in the wilderness (Numbers 20.08-12). Yet God chose him to deliver the children of Israel out of Egypt (Exodus 12.33-14.31), through him gave the nation the Law (Exodus 20.01-17), talked to him “face to face, just as a man speaks to his friend” (Exodus 33.11) and led the nation to the borders of the Promised Land (Deuteronomy 32.49-50; Deuteronomy 34.01-04). God chose David, a lowly shepherd boy (1Samuel 17.28; 1Samuel 17.34-35), the youngest son of Jesse (1Samuel 17.12), overlooked by his family (1Samuel 16.01-11), who later became an adulterer and murderer (2Samuel 11.01-27). Yet God chose him to be the slayer of Goliath (1Samuel 17.01-58), anointed as the second king of Israel (1Samuel 16.12-13; 2Samuel 05.01-05; 1Chronicles 11.01-03) and still to this day he is regarded as the greatest king of Israel.

Luke 06.12 “It was at this time” or more literally it should read “In those days…” meaning that this account took place during the ministry of Jesus but not necessarily after the Luke 06.01-11 (The Lord of the Sabbath).

Luke 06.12 “that He went off to the mountain to pray” We are not told exactly what mountain that our Saviour went off to and prayed at, as there are many in the area around the Sea of Galilee. As much as this mystery might bother us, what is important here is the model that our LORD and Saviour displayed by withdrawing to a quite place in solitude to spend time in prayer communing with His Heavenly Father. Not only does Jesus model this, but also He tells His followers to do the same, to go to a secluded place in Matthew 06.05-06.

The Greek word that the Holy Spirit directed Dr. Luke to use here for “pray” in Luke 06.12 (as well as in Matthew 06.05-06) is (G4336) proseucomai and it means to pray to God. This word is used eighty-seven times in the New Testament with forty-eight of those occurring in the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke) and an additional sixteen times in the Book of Acts (which was also written by Dr. Luke), and never in the Gospel of John.

This is the second time Dr. Luke records for us that Jesus prayed, the first being in Luke 05.16 after He healed the man with leprosy.

Luke 06.12 “and He spent the whole night in prayer to God.” In the original Greek “the whole night” this is a phrase that medical writers used of all night watches (Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament), and its written as fact that Jesus spent the whole night literally in prayer to God. Here we see that Jesus desired and sought the direction of His Father in choosing the Apostles in the morning. There are those who might question why Jesus had the need to seek direction from His Father to choose the Apostles. Why didn’t Jesus just use His omniscience as God, thus knowing all things to pick the Apostles instead of staying up all night in prayer when He could have had a good night’s sleep? It is because like any other difficulty that Jesus endured, He endured them as a man, a man who had to seek the will of His Father just as you and I do. In Philippians 02.05-08, Paul explains how Jesus emptied Himself and did not cling to His rights as God when He came as a man. In answer to His all night in prayer, God revealed His will to Jesus for which of the disciples would be chosen to be Apostles.

Luke 06.13 Jesus then called all of His disciples to Him, and then from that group He chose twelve and called them Apostles. The Greek word for “apostle” is (G652) apostolov and it means a delegate, messenger, one sent forth with orders, much like an ambassador who is given full authority of the one who sent him. Remember, Jesus chose these twelve after spending all night in prayer with God (Luke 06.12), and that includes Judas the betrayer. Jesus would later say to His Apostles, “You did not choose Me but I chose you, and appointed you that you would go and bear fruit, and that your fruit would remain, so that whatever you ask of the Father in My name He may give to you.” (John 15.16) This is interesting in light of the rising popularity of Calvinism in the church today, we see that Jesus chose the twelve, including Judas after a night of prayer with God, yet Judas of his own will, contrary to Calvinism, chose not to follow Jesus in the end.

It wasn’t until later in Luke 09.01-02 that Jesus gave them a full commission and gives them the authority to do signs and wonders. Jesus chose twelve Apostles out of all of His disciples representing the twelve tribes of Israel. Because the nation of Israel and her leaders were not accepting of Jesus the Messiah, the twelve Apostles were to be the new leaders of God’s Kingdom. Paul writes that the Apostles were the foundation of the church in Ephesians 02.19-21. Jesus told the twelve Apostles in Luke 22.29-30 that they would rule and reign over Israel in the millennial kingdom (Revelation 20.01-06). John tells us on “the wall of the city (New Jerusalem) had twelve foundation stones, and on them were the twelve names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.” (Revelation 21.14) The foundation of the church (Ephesians 02.19-21) and New Jerusalem (Revelation 21.14) are the Apostles. The writer of Hebrews in Hebrews 03.01-02 called Jesus an apostle. The large group of disciples who followed Jesus were followers, the Apostles were those sent out by the authority of the Son of God. For the Jews, this was something already established in their culture. In Hebrew the word is shaliach and the first one mentioned in the Bible was Eliezer who was sent by Abraham to get a wife for Isaac (Genesis 24.01-67). David as well used shaliachim or messengers to propose marriage to Abigail (1Samuel 25.01-44).

From now on, these twelve Apostles were going to be with Jesus on a full-time basis. Dr. Luke now gives us the list of men whom Jesus chose after spending all night in prayer with His Father (Luke 06.12). They are also listed in Matthew 10.02-04, Mark 03.16-19 and Acts 01.13 (which leaves out Judas Iscariot because at this time he had already committed suicide, Matthew 27.03-08; Acts 01.18-19; 2Corinthians 07.10).

Luke 06.14 “Simon, whom He also named Peter” Peter is by far the most well known of these twelve Apostles and in all four lists is always mentioned first (see also Matthew 10.02-04, Mark 03.16-19 and Acts 01.13). As we have already seen, Peter was married, since Jesus healed his mother-in-law (Luke 04.38-39) and Paul mentioned that Peter had a wife in 1Corinthians 09.05. Simon was his given name and when Jesus first met Simon, “Jesus looked at him and said, “You are Simon the son of John; you shall be called Cephas” (which is translated Peter).” (John 01.42) Eight other times in the New Testament Simon Peter is referred to as Cephas, which is the Aramaic equivalent of Peter (1Corinthians 01.12; 1Corinthians 03.22; 1Corinthians 09.05; 1Corinthians 15.05; Galatians 01.18; Galatians 02.09; Galatians 02.11; Galatians 02.14).

The name Peter is taken from the Greek word (G4074) Petrov Petros and in English today it would be “Rocky”. When Jesus said, “I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades will not overpower it.” (Matthew 16.18), Matthew records for us a different Greek word for “rock” in this statement by our LORD. The Greek word that he used for “rock” is (G4073) petra petra. (G4074) Petrov Petros is different than (G4073) petra petra. The Greek word (G4073) petra petra implies a rock that is a sure foundation (Matthew 07.24-25; Matthew 16.18; Matthew 27.51; Matthew 27.60; Mark 15.46; Luke 06.48 (twice)), which is different than (G4074) Petrov Petros which is a detached stone or boulder, or a stone that might be thrown or easily moved (cf. Vine, W.E.; Merrill F. Unger (1996-08-28). Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words: With Topical Index (Kindle Locations 52395-52405). Thomas Nelson. Kindle Edition.)

Peter was just a boulder on built on top of the foundation of Jesus (1Corinthians 03.11). Peter, unlike what the Roman Catholics teach and believe is not the rock that the church is built on, for Christ is the rock or sure foundation of the church (Ephesians 02.20). Peter himself in his first epistle compares believers as small stones that a part of the church (1Peter 02.01-10), where the word for stone is the Greek word (G3037) liyov.

Peter was a fisherman (Matthew 04.18; Mark 01.16; Luke 05.01-11; John 21.01-08), who usually spoke the most, was part of the inner circle with James and John (Matthew 17.01-08; Matthew 26.36-37; Mark 05.35-43; Mark 09.01-08; Mark 14.32-33; Luke 08.51; Luke 09.28-36), walked on water but then sunk because of his lack of faith (Matthew 14.25-33), was the one who confessed that Jesus is the Messiah (Matthew 16.13-20; Mark 08.27-30; Luke 09.18-21) but was also rebuked by Jesus and called Satan (Matthew 16.21-23; Mark 08.31-33). Peter boasted that he would never forsake Jesus (Matthew 26.31-35; Mark 14.27-31; Luke 22.33; John 13.31-38), yet he denied Jesus three times (Matthew 26.69-75; Mark 14.66-72; Luke 22.54-62; John 18.15-27), yet unlike Judas (Matthew 27.03-08; Acts 01.18-19; 2Corinthians 07.10) showed a Godly sorrow for his sins and was restored to fellowship by Jesus on the shore of the Sea of Galilee after Jesus was resurrected (John 21.15-17).

Peter was instrumental at the beginning of the church in the Book of Acts and wrote the two books that bear his name. Church history states that he was crucified upside down, as he refused to be crucified the same way as His Lord. Most people note that being crucified upside down is even worse than right side up.

Luke 06.14 “and Andrew his brother” Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother is usually always mentioned in connection with Peter (Matthew 04.18; Matthew 10.02; Mark 01.16; Mark 01.29; John 01.40; John 01.44; John 06.08). Like Peter, Andrew was from Bethsaida (John 01.44) and both later moved to Capernaum (Mark 01.21; Mark 01.29) and had a fishing business together (Matthew 04.18). Andrew was a disciple of John the Baptist and started to follow Jesus when John the Baptist proclaimed Jesus as “the Lamb of God!” (John 01.35-36) Andrew then introduced Simon Peter to Jesus after following Jesus (John 01.35-42). Andrew was the Apostle who found the young boy that had the lunch of five loaves and two fish that Jesus used to feed five thousand men (John 06.01-14).

When you see Andrew being mentioned in the Gospel, he is usually bringing someone to Jesus. Church history tells us that he went to Scythia, which is north of the Black Sea, where he also suffered death by crucifixion.

Luke 06.14 “and James and John” Theses two brothers are always mentioned in connection with each other and they were the sons of a man named Zebedee (which means giving, Matthew 04.21; Matthew 10.02; Mark 01.19-20; Mark 10.35; Luke 05.10). They were partners with Simon Peter and Andrew in the fishing business before they were called by Jesus to follow Him (Luke 05.01-11), and were part of the inner circle with Peter and Jesus (Matthew 17.01-08; Matthew 26.36-37; Mark 05.35-43; Mark 09.01-08; Mark 14.32-33; Luke 08.51; Luke 09.28-36). They were nicknamed the “Sons of Thunder” by Jesus (Mark 03.17). The Bible does not tells us why Jesus gave them this nickname, many feel it was because they wanted to call down fire from heaven to consume a Samaritan village in Luke 09.51-56. James and John were also the ones who had their mother go to Jesus to ask if her sons could sit on the right and the left of Jesus (Matthew 20.20-24). Many tend to think that Salome was their mother, and if so, Salome was the sister of Jesus’ mother Mary, thus making them cousins of Jesus. Salome was one of the women who ministered to Jesus (Matthew 27.55-56; Mark 15.40; Mark 16.01) and possibly even contributed financially (Luke 08.02-03).

According to church history, James was the first Apostle to be martyred. Herod ordered the death of James by a sword in Acts 12.01-02.

John was probably younger since he is always listed after his brother James. John was probably originally like Andrew, a disciple of John the Baptist and started to follow Jesus when John the Baptist proclaimed Jesus as “the Lamb of God!” (John 01.35-36). John wrote five books of the New Testament, the Gospel of John, 1John, 2John, 3John and the Book of Revelation. He called himself the “disciple whom Jesus loved” (John 13.23; John 20.02; John 21.07; John 21.20-24) in his Gospel account.

John was placed into a cauldron of boiling oil and banished to the island of Patmos (Revelation 01.09), where we received the Revelation of Jesus Christ about the end times (Revelation 01.01-03). According to historians, at the age of one hundred years old, he was taken from church to church throughout the region of Asia Minor (present-day Turkey). When the people heard that John had arrived they all ran to gather around him, for he was the last surviving member of the twelve Apostles that were hand picked by Jesus. They were all expecting him to share these amazing memories and glorious insights to share with them. Yet time after time, place after place, John would stand to his feet, look out at the crowd and utter one sentence of just five words: “Little children, love one another.” John is the only Apostle that we know for sure that was not martyred.

Luke 06.14 “and Philip” In all four lists of the Apostles (see also Matthew 10.02-04, Mark 03.16-19 and Acts 01.13), Philip is always mentioned fifth. Just like Simon Peter and Andrew (John 01.44), Philip was originally from Bethsaida (John 12.21). Philip was met by Jesus (John 01.43) and was the disciple who Jesus asked, “Where are we to buy bread, so that these may eat?” (John 06.05) when Jesus was preaching to the five thousand men. And it was Philip who replied, “Two hundred denarii worth of bread is not sufficient for them, for everyone to receive a little.” (John 06.07) The last time we see Philip in the Gospels was in the Upper Room the night before Jesus’ arrest. Jesus had just said, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me. “If you had known Me, you would have known My Father also; from now on you know Him, and have seen Him.” (John 14.06-07) Philip then replies by foolishly asking, “Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us.” (John 14.08) Jesus then rebuked Philip and said to him, “Have I been so long with you, and yet you have not come to know Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father; how can you say, ‘Show us the Father’?” (John 14.09)

Philip is not Philip the evangelist that is mentioned in the Book of Acts (Acts 06.05; Acts 08.05-40; Acts 21.08). Church history tells us that Philip was martyred for his faith.

Luke 06.14 “and Bartholomew” or called Nathanael by John (John 01.45-49; John 21.02). John tells us that “Philip found Nathanael and said to him, “We have found Him of whom Moses in the Law and also the Prophets wrote--Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.” Nathanael said to him, “Can any good thing come out of Nazareth?” Philip *said to him, “Come and see.” Jesus saw Nathanael coming to Him, and said of him, “Behold, an Israelite indeed, in whom there is no deceit!” Nathanael said to Him, “How do You know me?” Jesus answered and said to him, “Before Philip called you, when you were under the fig tree, I saw you.” 49 Nathanael answered Him, “Rabbi, You are the Son of God; You are the King of Israel.” (John 01.45-49) Some accounts record that Bartholomew/Nathanael worked in India and was martyred, while other accounts have him ministering in Persia, Egypt, Armenia and Asia.

Luke 06.15 “and Matthew” Dr. Luke tells us that while Jesus was walking by the Sea of Galilee, He “noticed a tax collector named Levi sitting in the tax booth” (Luke 05.27) and we saw how Matthew threw a great party for Jesus and that Jesus stated that He was the Saviour of Sinners in Luke 05.27-39. There are no certain accounts of his life after the Gospels and his death, but some state that he was put to death by nails being driven through his body.

Luke 06.15 “and Thomas” is known as “Doubting Thomas” for making the statement,  “Unless I see in His hands the imprint of the nails, and put my finger into the place of the nails, and put my hand into His side, I will not believe.” (John 20.25) after the other Apostles telling him that they saw the risen Lord. Jesus then appeared to Thomas eight days later (John 20.26) and said to Thomas, “Reach here with your finger, and see My hands; and reach here your hand and put it into My side; and do not be unbelieving, but believing.” Thomas answered and said to Him, “My Lord and my God!” Jesus said to him, “Because you have seen Me, have you believed? Blessed are they who did not see, and yet believed.” (John 20.27-29)

The name though that Thomas is referred to in the Gospel of John is Didymus, which means twin (John 11.16; John 20.24; John 21.02). Scripture doesn’t record for us if he really had a twin or if it was just his nickname. Thomas was the eternal pessimist. For after the Jewish leaders of Bethany wanted to kill Jesus (John 10.31; John 10.39), Jesus left it was not His time to die (John 07.30). While they were away, Jesus heard the news that Lazarus, His friend had died (John 11.01-03). “Then after this He said to the disciples, “Let us go to Judea again.” The disciples said to Him, “Rabbi, the Jews were just now seeking to stone You, and are You going there again?” (John 11.07-08) “Therefore Thomas, who is called Didymus, said to his fellow disciples, “Let us also go, so that we may die with Him.” (John 11.16)

There seems to be some good evidence that Thomas shared the Gospel message to India and it was there that he was thrust through with a spear and died.

Luke 06.15 “James the son of Alphaeus” All that we have recorded for us in the New Testament about James is that his dad’s name was Alphaeus, his mother’s name was Mary and that he had a brother named Joseph or Joses (Matthew 27.56; Mark 15.40). Matthew the tax collector was also the son of Alphaeus (Mark 02.14), so it is possible that they were brothers. In Mark 15.40, James is called “James the less” or it can be translated as “Little James”. Some speculate that this was to distinguish him from James, the brother of Jesus who wrote the Book of James. Nothing much more is known of James.

Luke 06.15 “and Simon who was called the Zealot;” which means that Simon was a member of a radical, terroristic group called the Zealots. This was a group who were fervently dedicated and devoted to the Law of God, and would use any and all means necessary, including kidnapping and murder against anyone who was going to oppose them, especially the Romans who were occupying the land of Israel. The Zealots were the men who after Jerusalem fell in 70 a.d., they fled to the rock fortress of Masada and held out for three years. Finally, when the Romans were about to breakthrough, the committed mass suicide, men killing their kids and wives, and then each other. For they decided that it would be better dead than a slave of Rome. Anyone who was caught or suspect of being in partnership to the Romans, be it a Roman or a Jewish man, like Matthew the tax collector, the Zealots found nothing wrong with violently murdering them! By doing so, they believed and taught that they were doing God’s work. Simon the Zealot was said to have traveled all the way to the British Isles and there suffered martyrdom by crucifixion or being sawn into two.

Luke 06.16 “Judas the son of James” Matthew calls James here Thaddeus (Matthew 10.03) and some manuscripts have his name as Lebbaeus. Thaddeus literally means breast child and Lebbaeus means heart child. Today we would just call him a “momma’s boy”, and these nicknames suggest that he was probably the youngest in his family. John in John 14.22 mentions him when he asks Jesus when will His Kingdom come. Most accounts in history suggest that he traveled to Arabia and there suffered martyrdom by crucifixion or being sawn into two.

Luke 06.16 “and Judas Iscariot, who became a traitor.” Or this can be written in the Greek that He gave no signs of being a traitor when Jesus chose him. He was not this naturally evil looking guy that we see portrayed in the pictures and paintings. In fact, when Jesus said that one among them would betray him, not one of the other Apostles accused Judas of being the betrayer (John 13.21-30). Judas was also the one who keep the moneybox for the group and took advantage of that by stealing money from the moneybox (John 12.05-06; John 13.29). Because Judas Iscariot betrayed our LORD, he was always placed at the end of each of three lists of Apostles found in the Gospels (see also Matthew 10.02-04, Mark 03.16-19) and is left off the list in Acts 01.13 because by that time he was already dead.

Judas is the Greek version of the Jewish name Judah. His father was Simon Iscariot (John 06.71; John 13.02; John 13.26). Iscariot is probably the Greek translation of a Hebrew phrase that means the “the men of Kerioth”. The Old Testament mentions two places called Kerioth, one in Moab (Jeremiah 48.24; Jeremiah 48.41; Amos 02.02), and the other in the most southern part of Judah, about fifteen miles south of Hebron (Joshua 15.25), which is the likely place where Judas and his father were from. If true, this made Judas the only member of the twelve Apostles from Judah, for the rest where all from the Galilee. The Judeans looked down upon the Galileans, seeing them as uncivilized country bumpkins. Scripture does not record for us the call of Judas by Jesus, some seem to think that it was probably during the time when Jesus came into Judea and baptized people in John 03.22. Just like the other Apostles, when Jesus chose Judas to be one of the Apostles, he too would have left his prior occupation to follow Jesus full time. In fact, Judas stayed with Jesus when many of the large group of disciples forsook Jesus in John 06.66-71. Unlike the other eleven Apostles, Judas did not believe that Jesus was the Son of God (Matthew 16.16) through Whom is found eternal life (John 03.16; John 05.24; John 06.40; John 06.68). He was like the other eleven Apostles though, who all thought that Jesus was there to overthrow Rome and be the conquering Messiah.

In this group of twelve Apostles, we see two sets of brothers (Peter and Andrew, James and John); men who were in business with one another (Peter, James and John), those who had opposing political perspectives in Matthew the Roman tax collector and the Roman hating zealot Simon. There was one Judean (Judas Iscariot) and eleven Galileans.

We see the list of the Apostles, those chosen by Jesus from many disciples to be the ones that were closer to Jesus than any other person in the world at this time. Yet, we know that Judas later was the betrayer, and in him we see that even those who are “physically” close can still not be saved. Remember, Jesus chose these twelve (John 15.16) after spending all night in prayer with God (Luke 06.12), and that includes Judas the betrayer.

This also serves as a good reminder that Jesus and the writers of the New Testament all warned that there will be false teachers arising from within the church (Matthew 07.15-23; Acts 20.27-30; Romans 16.17-18; 2Corinthians 11.12-15; 1Timothy 04.01; 2Timothy 03.13-17; 2Timothy 04.03-04; Titus 01.10-16; Titus 03.10-11; 2Peter 02.01-02; 1John 02.18; 1John 04.01;), and those men and women claim to follow Jesus but don’t have a true relationship with Him. Paul mentioned false teachers by name (1Timothy 01.20; 2Timothy 02.17), specifically Hymenaeus who said that the resurrection at the end was already past (2Timothy 02.16-18), and Hymenaeus led Philetus astray. Alexander was another false teacher that Paul mentioned, for Alexander stood up against Paul and Timothy and the sound teaching of the Word (2Timothy 04.14). People continue to view these false teachers, wolves in sheep’s clothing with pragmatism, the ends justify the means, and say things such as, well people are getting saved or they are doing good things for God. Judas shows us that doing good works for God, being physically close to Jesus and naming the name of Christ does not necessarily mean that they are a true disciple of Jesus. Jesus chose Judas, but Judas DID NOT choose Jesus. The Old Testament prophesied that Judas would betray Jesus in Psalm 41.09 and Psalm 55.12-14 and these were fulfilled in John 13.18. The prophet Zechariah prophesied that Judas would be paid thirty shekels of silver for betraying Jesus (Zechariah 11.12-13) and fulfilled in Matthew 27.09-10.

There are no more capital “A” apostles, for the requirements to be a capital “A” apostle were:
01. They must have been chosen by the LORD (Luke 06.12-13; Ephesians 04.11).
02. They must have seen the risen Christ (Acts 01.15; Acts 01.21-22; 1Corinthians 09.01). There are none today have seen risen Christ (1Peter 01.08).
03. They must have the authority to perform miracles (2Corinthians 12.12).
04. They must have the power to impart gifts of Holy Spirit (2Timothy 01.06).
05. They must have had fellowship with Christ (Acts 01.21-22).
06. They must have been commissioned to write the Scriptures (2Peter 03.14-16).
07. They have already laid the foundation of the church (Ephesians 02.20).